The Law Office of Brian Jones is OPEN and READY to defend your rights! We are available 24/7 by phone, text, or chat. Also we can accommodate your consultations via video or phone conference due to the COVID-19 pandemic. (740) 363-3900
On September 30th, the Supreme of Ohio made a decision that clarifies how felony OVI sentencing works in harmony with repeat offender sentencing. Ultimately, the Court decided that while a repeat-offender specification should be considered along with the underlying OVI felony offense when determining sentencing, they should not be considered a “bundle” but, rather, two separate sentences.
The court was examining an appeal that was granted by the Ninth District Appellate Court. The initial case involved a man, Edward South, who was convicted of a third-degree felony for driving under the influence with a prior conviction. The sentence that was imposed for his conviction was a five-year mandatory prison term for the third-degree felony as well as a consecutive three-year mandatory prison term for the repeat-offense, a total of an 8-year mandatory prison sentence.
The Ninth District decided that the sentence was unlawful, as Ohio law states the following:
The conflict lies in whether or not the penalty for the specification changes the maximum sentence for the underlying felony. While the initial court decision concluded that it does, the Ninth District concluded that it does not, and overturned the entire 8-year sentence and sent the case back to the trial court for re-sentencing.
The Ohio Supreme Court disagreed with the Ninth District’s ruling. While they agreed that the five-year mandatory sentence for the third-degree felony was unlawful, they considered the three-year mandatory sentence to be justified by the laws of sentencing regarding repeat-offender specifications. Therefore, they re-instated the three-year mandatory sentence and sent the case of the third-degree felony back to trial for re-sentencing.
What does this all mean?
There were two mistakes made in these proceedings. The first mistake was the trial court misinterpreting the statutes to mean that one provision and its sentencing affects another. The second mistake was the Ninth District assuming that the two sentences were a “bundle” and overturning the whole thing, when only a portion of it was unlawful.
Essentially, this means that the penalty for an OVI felony and a penalty for a repeat offense are considered two separate sentences and one should not affect the other. To learn how this might affect your case, contact our team of Delaware OVI defense attorneys today.
Brian Glen Jones graduated from Ohio Wesleyan University with a Bachelors Degree in Politics and Government. He then went on to earn his Juris Doctorate degree from the University Of Akron School Of Law. Brian has been a lifelong resident of Ohio. Brian is licensed to practice law in the state of Ohio and before the United States District Court for the Northern and Southern Districts of Ohio.
Calling a knowledgeable criminal defense lawyer before speaking to law enforcement is the best way to protect your future. Our attorneys will work to minimize or eliminate the possibility of jail time, a prison sentence, probation, hefty fines and a permanent criminal record. Call us now at 740-363-3900 to schedule your free consultation with one of the firm’s knowledgeable attorneys.
Put A Top-Rated Defense Attorney In Your Corner
Our experienced criminal defense lawyers aggressively defend people who are accused of crimes across Central Ohio.
52 North Sandusky Street
Delaware, OH 43015